Saturday, June 7, 2008
"It doesn't quite add up," down under
The last thing that a monopoly consumes is itself. Nobody wants to compete, with a monopoly. Ideas are competitive.
EcoCAR: The NeXt Challenge
The other idea is smarter roads and highways.
"The Smart Road includes an advanced communications system including a wireless LAN interfaced with a fiber-optic back-bone. The network interfaces with several on-site data acquisition systems and road feature controls. This network may be used to transfer data between the vehicle, research building, and infrastructure within the Road."
The information highway should manage fuel prices since prices are just another piece of information.
Enron redux
Value, Price and Economic Controls
Why is the price of oil so high and what will happen as a result? Compare this with information, which we have rendered essentially free because it has a value which extends the value of other things. Oil is dependent on other things to have value beyond the cost of production to add value. A medium sized commercial jet has a design that takes oil into consideration. The jet can be operated cost effectively at an oil cost up to about $40.00 per barrel of oil. Anything over that threshold produces losses, airlines fail, and people look for alternative transportation. People use information to rearrange travel plans to get the best bargain and if the best bargain is not economically sound, people will not travel. Oil makes the airport possible from the aircraft to all the other support vehicles. This industry consumes lots of oil. It also runs on information to coordinate flights and control air traffic. We have air traffic controls so the jets don’t crash into each other killing passengers and destroying equipment and facilities. We must have economic controls to do the same thing. When the price of oil threatens stability, we must slow it down to prevent it from destroying the machinery we all depend on.
The economic controls are only possible on the supply side. Demand will follow price to some logical conclusion. Supply side controls that measure demand, speculation, and actual consumption serve the market by separating statistically true demand from speculation thus eliminating demand produced by speculation. Speculation is running up oil prices to artificial new highs because universities as well as other institutional investors are guessing that oil will reach higher prices and speculation ensures that they will. This is why the speculators are always right at the expense of the market for true demand. Accounting for speculation is not difficult and serves to control runaway prices created as a result of speculation that captures value without returning anything of lasting value. Speculation can’t be eliminated, it can only be measured reported and factored into judgments about price.
The economic controls are accounting controls, that allow for market corrections to be made in order to prevent a complete breakdown as a result of speculation that creates a false snapshot of the specific commodity market. An extreme example of the damage caused by the lack of this sort of control in energy markets is Enron, which engaged in energy speculation and then collapsed as a result of the illusions it created by believing it could ride out any storms caused by a false market it was developing. Since that collapse, it appears that speculation has only increased and the institutions are now engaged in the same sort of market making to raise funds, with no long term strategy to deal with the downside of such behaviors. The immediate downside is in the aviation, trucking and consumer fuel business. Higher costs slow down economic growth, while making food cost soar to higher levels. Speculation that concludes that food will cost more produces food that will cost more as a result of higher perceived energy demand. The higher food costs have no long term benefit, unlike education which has a great long term benefit. The irony is that by speculating on oil price futures, universities are contributing to higher food costs as a result of increased energy prices that aren’t the result of demand for energy. If we didn’t learn the lesson with Enron, the lesson is being repeated by our universities.